factsdomatter.org

Facts Do Matter

Organizations Addressing Misinformation

AFP Fact Check
https://factcheck.afp.com/

Reuters Fact Check
https://ww w .reuters.com/fact-check/

Check Your Fact

PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com/

PolitiFact/HealthCheck: A partnership with Kaiser Health News that helps find the truth in politics, including health-related claims4.

FactCheck.org
https://www.factcheck.org/

FactCheck.org: A nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that aims to reduce deception and confusion in U.S. politics, including scientific claims1 4.

Washington Post Fact Checker
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fact-checker/

Washington Post Fact Checker: This feature, while covering various topics, also addresses scientific claims and misinformation1 8

Snopes
https://www.snopes.com/

Snopes: One of the oldest and largest fact-checking sites online, Snopes investigates various claims, including scientific ones1 4.

Duke Reporters Lab
https://reporterslab.org/fact-checking/

SciCheck
https://www.factcheck.org/scicheck/

SciCheck: A branch of FactCheck.org that focuses exclusively on false and misleading scientific claims made by partisans to influence public policy1 4.

Media Bias/Fact Check
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/

Media Bias/Fact Check: An American website that focuses on both political bias and factual reporting, helping readers identify potential biases in news sources.

NPR Fact Check (defunct)
https://www.npr.org/sections/politics-fact-check

NPR Fact Check: Operated by the American nonprofit media organization NPR, this service focuses on current news events, including scientific topics.

Claim Review Project
https://www.claimreviewproject.com/

KSJ Fact-Checking Project
https://ksjfactcheck.org/

International Fact-Checking Network
https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/

Science Feedback
https://science.feedback.org/

Science Feedback: This organization reviews climate-related and health and medical claims. Their fact-checkers are PhDs with recently published articles in top-tier peer-reviewed science journals, making it one of the best fact-checkers for science-related claims2

Climate Feedback

- Another branch of Science Feedback, Climate Feedback specializes in fact-checking climate science information.
- Health Feedback
  - Part of Science Feedback, Health Feedback focuses specifically on evaluating the credibility of health-related information in the media

Hoaxy2
https://hoaxy.osome.iu.edu/

AllSides
https://www.allsides.com/unbiased-balanced-news

SourceWatch
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/SourceWatch

Poynter Fact-Checking
https://www.poynter.org/media-news/fact-checking/

Verification Handbook
https://s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/datajournalismcom/handbooks/Verification-Handbook-1.pdf

Health Feedback: A worldwide network of scientists sorting fact from fiction in health and medical media coverage

Retraction Watch: This organization reports on retractions of peer-reviewed scientific journal articles, helping to maintain the integrity of scientific literature

ScienceUpFirst: A national initiative that works with a collective of independent scientists, researchers, health care experts, and science communicators to address misinformation

AP Fact Check: While not exclusively focused on scientific claims, the Associated Press fact-checking team often addresses scientific misinformation

Lead Stories: This fact-checking organization uses its own technology called “Trendolizer” to detect trending hoaxes from known fake news sites, satirical websites, and prank generators.

The Skeptics Society
- This organization promotes scientific skepticism and critical thinking, often debunking pseudoscientific claims and misinformation.

The News Literacy Project
- This nonpartisan national education nonprofit provides programs and resources to help individuals of all ages become more news-literate and discerning consumers of information, including scientific claims.

Articles about effective ways to communicate fact-checking scientific claims

Perplexity:

Here are some articles about effective ways to communicate fact-checking claims about science:

“Impactful fact-checking for science: communication strategies applying artificial intelligence as the source of information” – This research explores how labeling an information source as AI can improve the credibility of science information and reduce partisan bias in evaluating fact-checking messages1.
“The global effectiveness of fact-checking” – This study found that fact-checks reduced false beliefs across multiple countries, with effects lasting more than two weeks in most cases2.
“Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor” – This article argues for a collaborative approach to science communication, supported by technology, to improve the quality and responsiveness of scientific messages3.
“5 things to keep in mind when fact-checking claims about science” – This piece offers practical advice for fact-checkers, including assessing study design, prioritizing replication, and explaining uncertainties in available evidence4.
“Science Communication in the Age of Misinformation” – This article provides strategies for effective science communication, including simplifying complex concepts, building trust, and proactively counteracting misinformation5.
“Does Fact-Checking Work? Here’s What the Science Says” – This piece discusses research showing that fact-checking can partially reduce misperceptions about false claims, though it’s less effective for polarized issues6.
“A four-step process to transform everyone into a fact-checker” – This article outlines a strategy to combat misinformation by improving media literacy and fact-checking skills7.

These articles offer various perspectives and strategies for effectively communicating fact-checking claims about science, from leveraging AI to improving public engagement and understanding.

Home

Facts Do Matter

Organizations Addressing Misinformation

Articles about effective ways to communicate fact-checking scientific claims

Citations: